SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rande Is who wrote (4063)6/6/1999 8:31:00 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) of 12823
 
Rande,

Thanks for the clarity.

This Oregon ruling is just a bump in the road for them, in my opinion. I concur.

1)Panner's ruling is a summary judgement and will set no precedent. The 9th Circuit will have no choice but to remand.

2)Clearly the control of T's plant is under Federal Jurisdiction, due to ICC clauses, (no typo). The volunteers at Mt. Hood CRC can play any games they want, but they cannot control activity that is on the FCCs turf.

3)The FCC wants a 'hand's off' policy. And local telephone competition.

4)As Frank, ahhhaha and other technicals have suggested, the MHCRC volunteers haven't a clue as to the practical aspects of what they are requiring of T in regards to colocations.

Best, Ry
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News