Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 37.89

-0.1%

Nov 12 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tony Viola who wrote (83000)	6/7/1999 11:20:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Tony - <Didn't Intel put off copper until 0.13 because they thought they'd get more bang for their buck in improving the basic transistor performance and K dielectrics (out of my league here)?> Intel's approach for .18 is to drive basic transistor performance, without having to inject the risk of implementing Copper at this stage in its (Cu's) development. I would / will be curious to get a good feel as to how process integration issues (that translates to yield) are playing out with these processes at .18. As for Low-K dielectrics, Intel also another very low risk approach with Fluorinated SiO (SiOF). TSMC took this approach also. Next generation low-k dielectrics are very immature at this stage, and bring on a host of integration issues. Do you have any WAG on defect densities for IBM's Cu process? PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next