|
There is only so far that the paleocons can go with the libertarians, because of the social issues. As for the old- line progressives, I am not sure who you have in mind. I thought the old- line progressives were the neoconservatives:-)...If what you mean is a paleocon- populist alliance, along the line that Pat Buchanan's economic positions would permit, then you have something. However, that would make it even more difficult, since many paleocons are not prepared to follow Pat down the path of protectionism and industrial policy, and many old- line progressives would find his hardline on the social issues too much. In any event, the use of the term "dyspepsia" is precise and to the point. At this point, there is little to distinguish most neocons and paleocons except the insistence of paleocons to continue with resentment at the interlopers. Who was it who said (I believe in the American Spectator) that it was fine for the town whore to get religion, but she should not be allowed to lead the church choir? Well, not only is that offensive, but it belies the role that people like Whittaker Chambers and John Burnham played in the development of modern conservativism. Besides, for someone like me who identifies with the neoconservatives, but cast his first vote for Reagan when he was 24, it is pretty darn hard to feel like the town whore. Also, too many of the people leading the charge now are at least party switchers, especially in the South, to insist on a pristine past.... |
