Too bad they missed out and forgot to put SCH on the SHAT list.
I created the SHAT, (based on the referenced recommendation), I did NOT forget to put SCH.... indeed I considered it, but that would have cloud the objective....
Which is... that the so called analysts, (and other stock hens), who create such ratings, announcements and the like, and are not really that successful, to the point of looking poor...even deceiving. (INTEL's case comes to mind about two years ago or so....)
In my eyes, there is no better way to invest/trade/speculate, that one's own conclusions as no-one is best suited to understand one's objectives, nor decide, when it is appropriate to sell, short, or whatever..... History seems to be on my side, at least for the last 17 years or so.....
Particularly, when no tangible evidence, nor logical reasoning is given to such opinions that are expressed in such pontifical ways....
Indeed, Merrill Lynch's decision to enter the discount/on line brokerage, more than proves my point...
There is going to be a lot of talent out there... available for hire... |