SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INTC
INTC 43.75+0.6%Dec 3 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sophia Ashley who wrote (21)3/16/1997 9:15:00 PM
From: Jules B. Garfunkel   of 990
 
Sophia,
Thank you for posting the news on Digital and bringing it to our attention. I did not know that this new alpha chip was coming, but evidently Dan Niles, the analyst for Robinson Stephens, did. I just wonder if this announcement was the reason for Intel selling off so rapidly on Friday late afternoon. BTW I think that Dan Niles is one of the best analysts covering Intel.

All,
Unfortunately, I do not have the time tonight to review in detail my recent thoughts on Intel. I will tell you though that nothing has really changed in my mind since early January. Over the last two months I have posted my thoughts, and if anyone is interested, you might want to search on "Jules" and read my posts re Intel. I have recently bought back all the Intel Calls that I sold in early January, and began adding a few Intel Calls, very cautiously. I began adding these calls the last time Intel was at 137-138. I still remain very concerned on what the overall market will do, but I am watching for when jmac sells his Intel as a sign that all of the irrational exuberance that existed in December, and early January, has been dissipated.

I continue to hold a very large number of IBM Put contracts to hedge against a deep correction in the market, or technology stocks more specific. Much to my chagrin IBM sure did not do what I expected it to do last week, however, if you want to read my reasons for remaining negative on IBM, you might want to read my recent posts on the IBM thread.
Jules
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext