SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 234.70-1.2%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (61138)6/8/1999 11:40:00 AM
From: ShortyBear  Read Replies (1) of 164684
 
The opposite is brand identity dilution, because
few customers will buy from a diluted brand.
That's why specialty stores often do better
than department stores -- they have a brand
that means something to consumers. In the
long run, consumers often assume that a specialist
(e.g. the Gap for jeans) is better place to buy
than a generalist (e.g. Sears for jeans).
There are some counter examples, but this
rule typically holds true. My point was that
in the case of Amazon, the brand identity built
up in online book sales may (eventually) be lost
to B&N, Borders, etc. Meanwhile, the new
businesses may spark a lot of short term
interest, but inevitably fail to gain market
share from more specialized competitors.
In the end, if AMZN suffers from this, lackluster
sales will result (perhaps bankruptcy also, if
it the results are bad enough).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext