Your response to this post has earned you the benefit of the doubt. But to be honest, it is not something you need to earn from me.
Your post to Ed was obviously misinterpreted by me just like Ed's response to my post. I meant no offense to him when I posted what I posted yet I received his response. Therefore, when researching what might have caused this type of response, I came across your post to him. Well one thing led to another and you became a "cause" for this type of reponse and therefore, you saw my response to Ed and the reference to you.
No one is perfect, and I demonstrated that. Given the set of circumstances and the way I presented the information, you were the villain behind this situation.
Your response to me clearly indicates that a mistake and misinterpretation of the facts as presented, was made by me in this matter. Therefore, as you have outlined in your response, an apology is due you for my comments.
Please accept my apology for jumping to the wrong conclusion. However, you have to admit, the way the information was presented and the logic behind my comments, you made a pretty convincing villain. Just goes to show, you never know.
As a matter of fact, please post this apology wherever you feel it necessary to right this situation in your mind.
Andrew Vance |
