SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jens M. Ottow who wrote (61088)6/9/1999 11:37:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) of 1572878
 
Jens

Re: "Some remarks from Tom Pabst on the K7: I'll give you 100 bucks for each benchmark or application that runs faster on a PIII than on a K7 at the same clock speed"

Nothing much new here and 100 bucks isn't much. They continue to compare the K7 to the PIII. My take on this is that they are not comparing it to the coppermine. How could they when they don't know the performance boost Intel will enjoy with larger on-die L2 cache. No mention of Xeon either, always PIII. In addition the article states the chipset won't support AGP4X or ATA-66 and will use 100MHz SDRAMs. More reason to believe they are not comparing performance to Coppermine and it's Camino chipset.

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News