Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: fyo who wrote (61224)	6/10/1999 12:33:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) of 1572772

FYO - Re: ". W.r.t. the .25mu process, AMD had a much weaker design, yet they managed to keep 'relatively' close to Intel. To me that indicates that their process can't be that far behind, if at all." FYI - AMD had to JACK UP their already high 2.2 volt Vcc to 2.4 volts just to overclock their 400 MHz parts to 450 and 475 MHZ for the K6-2. However, the Kmart 63 required the 2.4 Volt JACKED UP Voltage just to get it to run at 400 MHz ! Intel's 550 MHz Pentium III runs at 2.0 volts, for your reference. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next