SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (61230)6/10/1999 2:47:00 AM
From: fyo  Read Replies (1) of 1572833
 
Paul: FYI - AMD had to JACK UP their already high 2.2 volt Vcc to 2.4 volts just to overclock their 400 MHz parts to 450 and 475 MHZ for the K6-2.

How come I knew that one was coming?

Ok, I'll try this one time:

Yes, AMD had to 'jack up' their voltage. But it is NOT reasonable to say that their starting voltage (2.2V) is high just because Intel's is lower. It doesn't work that way. Voltage is NOT simply a matter of how good your process is. Hell, the Alpha processors have always used extremely low voltages despite a fairly poor process. This also explains why the K7 uses 1.6V. Also, please note that POWER consumption is not solely dependent on the voltage. Both the K7 and the Alpha chips draw an incredible amount of current, but use a low core voltage.

--fyodor
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext