Oops, I was correcting a typo and cut the bottom portion off by mistake.
Anyhow, here is the most recent NASD report, and since the gun charge has now been omitted, it would only be fair to post the newer version:
ASSOCIATED PERSON: ELGINDY, AMR IBRAHIM CRD NUMBER: 1824634 6/09/99 SUMMARY INFORMATION 6/09/99: 12/16/98 NASD SUSPENSION ACTION INITIATED BY: NASD; CASE/DOCKET NUMBER: NOT PROVIDED; ALLEGATIONS: FAILING TO PAY AN ARBITRATION AWARD IN ARBITRATION CASE # 98-00005; HOW RESOLVED: NOT PROVIDED; RESOLUTION DATE: NOT PROVIDED; SANCTION: SUSPENSION. lm 6/09/99: 9/18/98 NASD REVOCATION ACTION INITIATED BY: NASD; CASE/DOCKET NUMBER: NOT PROVIDED; ALLEGATIONS: FAILURE TO PAY FINES AND/OR COSTS IN NASD COMPLAINT CMS950207; HOW RESOLVED: NOT PROVIDED; RESOLUTION DATE: NOT PROVIDED; SANCTION: REVOCATION OF REGISTRATION. lm 6/09/99: 9/22/97 NASD SUSPENSION ACTION INITIATED BY: NASD; CASE/DOCKET NUMBER: CMS950207; ALLEGATIONS: VIOLATION OF SOES RULE c)3(C) AND ARTICLE III, SECTION 1 OF THE ASSOCIATION'S RULES OF FAIR PRACTICE IN THAT ELGINDY EXECUTED 108 ORDERS THROUGH SOES FOR THE ACCOUNT OF A FIRM. VIOLATION OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 1 OF RULES OF FAIR PRACTICE FOR CAUSING FIRM TO ENTER NON-BONA-FIDE ORDERS FOR ACCOUNT OF FIRM. VIOLATION OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 1 OF RULES OF FAIR PRACTICE FOR FAILING TO ACKNOWLEDGE OR CONFIRM SALE OF SECURITIES TO 3 MARKET MAKERS WITHOUT EQUITABLE EXCUSE OR JUSTIFICATION. VIOLATION OF ARTICLE III, SECTIONS 1 AND 27 OF RULES OF FAIR PRACTICE FOR FAILING TO ENSURE THAT FIRM ESTABLISHED, MAINTAINED AND ENFORCED ITS SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES; HOW RESOLVED: DECISION AND ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF SETTLEMENT; RESOLUTION DATE: 9/22/97; SANCTION: CENSURE, FINE, SUSPENSION; TOTAL AMOUNT: $30,000; DATE PAID: NOT PROVIDED; ACTION/STATUS DISPOSITION DETAILS SUMMARY: SUSPENDED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY MEMBER IN A PRINCIPAL CAPACITY FOR PERIOD OF 1 YEAR. SUSPENDED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY MEMBER IN ANY CAPACITY FOR 30 DAYS. FINE TO BE PAID IN 23 EQUAL MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF $500 WITH REMAINING AMOUNT TO BE PAID WITHIN 24 MONTHS OF 1 ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER BY NBCC. FIXED INTEREST RATE WILL BE ASSESSED ON UNPAID BALANCE OF FINES AND/OR COSTS AND INTEREST RATE WILL BE 3% OF PRIME RATE AS PUBLISHED IN MONEY RATES COLUMN OF WALL STREET JOURNAL 1 DAY BEFORE INSTALLMENT PACKAGE IS MAILED. EXECUTED PROMISSORY NOTE FOR UNPAID BALANCE OF FINES AND/OR COSTS PLUS INTEREST IS REQUIRED, AND WITHIN 60 DAYS OF ACCEPTANCE OF THIS OFFER OF SETTLEMENT MEMBER FIRM WITH WHOM ELGINDY IS PRESENTLY ASSOCIATED SHALL REVISE AND IMPLEMENT WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES SPECIFICALLY WITH RESPECT TO OVERSEEING ELGINDY'S ACTIVITIES TO DETER RECURRENCE OF CONDUCT ALLEGED IN COMPLAINT. WITHIN 60 DAYS OF ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF SETTLEMENT, ELGINDY SHALL PRODUCE COPY OF THESE PROCEDURES TO MARKET REGULATION COMMITTEE. SUSPENSION IN PRINCIPAL CAPACITY WILL COMMENCE WITH OPENING OF BUSINESS 11/17/97 AND CONCLUDE 11/16/98. SUSPENSION IN ALL CAPACITIES WILL COMMENCE OPENING OF BUSINESS 11/17/97 AND CONCLUDE 12/16/97. 9/18/98 - REVOCATION FOR NON-PAYMENT OF FINES AND/OR COSTS.sc 6/09/99: 7/25/97 OHIO DENIAL OF REGISTRATION ACTION INITIATED BY: OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES; CASE/DOCKET NUMBER: 97-274; ALLEGATIONS: NOT OF GOOD BUSINESS REPUTE AS TERM IS DEFINED IN OHIO ADMIN. CODE RULE 1301:6-3-19(D)(G) & (9) AND OHIO REVISED CODE SECTION 1707.19(A); HOW RESOLVED: ORDER; RESOLUTION DATE: 7/25/97; SANCTION: DENIAL OF REGISTRATION.sc 6/09/99: 8/26/94 NASD ARBITRATION DATE INITIATED: 1/19/94; ALLEGATIONS: UNAUTHORIZED TRADING, CHURNING, MISREPRESENTATION; ALLEGED COMPENSATORY DAMAGE AMOUNT: $42,195.00; FILED WITH: NASD; DOCKET/CASE NUMBER: 93-04347; CURRENTLY PENDING: NO; DISPOSITION TYPE: AWARD; AWARD AMOUNT: $5,000.00; DISPOSITION DATE: 8/26/94.sc 6/09/99: 9/22/93 NASD ARBITRATION DATE INITIATED: 2/22/93; ALLEGATIONS: UNAUTHORIZED TRADING; ALLEGED COMPENSATORY DAMAGE AMOUNT: $96,892.69; FILED WITH: NASD; DOCKET/CASE NUMBER: 92-04071; CURRENTLY PENDING: NO; DISPOSITION TYPE: AWARD; AWARD AMOUNT: $30,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; DISPOSITION DATE: 9/22/93. lm |