PKDV Message Board - Msg: 10075542

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PKDV

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pitchlyn who wrote (41)	6/11/1999 12:44:00 AM
From: wonk	Read Replies (2) of 103

Are you suggesting that this is not the patent for the PKDV device? Is it even a possibility that it is? What's your take (in layman's terms)? My conclusion from your response was that it could not possibly be the device in question but I just want to make sure since you seem to have a handle on these matters and I certainly don't. I do not know if it is - or is not - the patent in question. 1. If it is not - then the question of the the actual procurement of a legitimate patent is still open. Given the fact that the new claimed owner cannot be found in the United States Patent and Trademark Office database is unsettling. One would think that Chyane Yan Enterprises Co., Ltd. would have perfected their legal rights to the patent prior to letting a multi-million US dollar contract to a third party for the device. In fact, it is standard prudent business for the third party (in this case Pan-Kai)to demand proof that valid title exists to the patent. Note that the USPTO database is current. 2. If this is the patent in question, then its a BS PR roughly equivalent to the infamous MTEI PR of May 1998. #reply-4814082 IMO ww

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next