Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (61380)	6/11/1999 2:23:00 AM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (1) of 1571927

Elmer, Re:"So let me see if I have this straight. AMD presented no spec numbers whatsoever. Nothing for the K7 and nothing for the Xeon, only relative numbers. Is that right? If so don't you find this strange? NO NUMBERS SCUMBRIA?? and nobody questioned this? Did they give system configurations? How do you know they were comparing it to a high performing Xeon system? Why no numbers??? Forgive me if I withold comment when there are no facts." Well you sure are spreading the FUD tonight old boy!!! Yesterday you were posting Intels spec numbers for its mobile processors and extrapolating a whole bunch of CRAP. And those numbers on Intels website were all RELATIVE. In fact they DONT DARE put the absolute numbers up except for very few CPU's. But you know all this don't you Elmer. Let me give you a HINT. Saying you run 40% faster makes for better headlines than saying Fp of 16 for intel and 22 for AMD. But you know all this. You just want to spread the FUD!!! Keep spreading the news. Kash

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next