SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc.
DELL 133.20+5.7%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank E W who wrote (132373)6/11/1999 7:52:00 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) of 176387
 
OT, Law, Courts and the Constitution.

Frank,

Reading the article it appears that the court was asked to rule strictly on whether the plantif had a case that could be validly brought to the court in Virginia, i.e., whether the court of Virginia had jurisdiction, not whether the alleged libel was in fact libel.

Separate question...are you saying that if the defendant had stated: "IMO, you're a pedophile", as opposed to, "You're a pedophile" then the defendant would have been protected under his/her first amendment rights regardless of any damages that may have resulted?

Best Regards,
Jim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News