Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (61465)	6/11/1999 5:53:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway	Read Replies (1) of 1572107

Re: "How about real numbers to back up the SpecInt95 comparisons? A report on another website says the Xeon was 23.6 and the K7 was ~25 based on an eyeball extrapolation. The best published Xeon result @550MHz is actually 24.4 not 23.6. That would make the difference only 1/2 what AMD claimed at ~2.5%. It is my guess that a Coppermine will match or slightly beat an equally clocked K7 in Integer performance. We will know before long." Elmer, you're getting confused. The website you're referring to took a published Xeon performance number and added 5% to it! You're then comparing this to another published Xeon performance number and saying you're not impressed with the K7 result?! Are you SURE this is the argument you want to make? Kevin

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next