Jacalyn, If you have read all my posts you will know that I have been more than cordial when responding to 95% of the post that I feel are worth the time and who are posted by something other than an obvious alias. (No matter what they say, pro or con, I refuse to respond to an obvious alias)
Does this look familiar?
I've been observing this stock issue - what appears to be the problem - is it with the felon arthur; with the company fundamentals, or with shorts? Thanks Jacalyn
This was your first post that I responded too. I don't really care what the average "alias" riff raff on this board says about me. But I don't appreciate being called a felon by someone who actually has the honesty to make a post under a real name. Particulary if they don't have a clue what they are talking about, but allude that they might.
As you saw in a followup post of mine #551. I believe, we buried the hatchet on that comment and I welcomed your comment about doing some serious DD on this Company. I beleive you said you had some info last week but would check it out and report back on this board this week. Then after several days of no comments on your part you seem to jump back in, not with what you discovered, but with worthless jocular banter along with the hoards of ignorant on this board.
Sorry, but I guess I expected more from a member of the Texas Bar Association.
Not trying to scare anyone. And certainly no need to check you out any further. Like I did, you admit who you are. That is enough for me. I am sure you are a fine person. But please, try to stay on point. Leave the dumb comments to the dumb on this board. If you have a valid question, and if I know the answer, I will answer it honestly as I have with all that I have responded to on this board.
Art |
