Disloyalty of Democrats
Salon Magazine
June 7, 1999 David Horowitz
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
Not for commercial use, soley to be used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion.
Just as the government prepared to release the Cox Report, which would reveal that the communist regime in Beijing had stolen design information for every advanced nuclear weapon in the U.S. arsenal, the Democratic National Committee announced the appointment of a longtime communist sympathizer, Carlottia Scott, as its new "political issues director." Scott is a former mistress of the Marxist dictator of Grenada, and was an ardent supporter of America's communist adversaries during the Cold War.
The timing of the DNC's announcement was appropriately ironic, in that this appointment tells us volumes about the roots of the nation's growing security crisis: the dramatic erosion of America's military credibility in an ill-conceived war, and the theft of its nuclear arsenal by an adversary the administration claims is a "strategic partner."
Carlottia Scott was for many years the chief aide to Rep. Ron Dellums, a Berkeley radical who, with the approval of the congressional Democratic leadership, was appointed first to the Armed Services Committee and then to the chair of its subcommittee on military installations, which oversees U.S. bases worldwide. The Democratic leadership apparently saw no problem in the fact that every year during the Cold War with the Soviet empire, Dellums introduced a "peace" budget, which would have required a 75 percent reduction in government spending on America's defenses.
Nor did they have any problem with Dellums' performance during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, which occurred on Jimmy Carter's watch. As Soviet troops poured across the Afghan border and President Carter called for the resumption of the military draft, Dellums told a "Stop the Draft" rally in Berkeley that "Washington, D.C., is a very evil place," and the only "arc" of a crisis that he could see was "the one that runs between the basement of the West Wing of the White House and the war room of the Pentagon."
Among the government documents retrieved when the Marxist government in Grenada was overthrown were the love letters of Dellums' chief aide, Carlottia Scott, to its anti-American dictator, Maurice Bishop. Scott wrote: "Ron has become truly committed to Grenada ... He's really hooked on you and Grenada and doesn't want anything to happen to building the Revolution and making it strong ... The only other person that I know of that he expresses such admiration for is Fidel."
Bishop and Fidel were not the only communists in the Americas favored by Dellums and his aide. About the time these letters were retrieved, Dellums was opening his congressional office to a Cuban intelligence agent who proceeded to organize support committees in the United States for the communist guerrilla movement in El Salvador. Yet, when Dellums' retired, the Clinton administration's secretary of defense, William S. Cohen, bestowed on him the highest civilian honor the Pentagon can award "for service to his country."
After Dellums' retirement, Scott became the chief of staff to his successor, Berkeley leftist Barbara Lee. In the 1970s Lee was a confidential aide to Huey Newton, the "minister of defense" of the Black Panther Party, whose calling card was the "Red Book" of Chinese dictator Mao Zedong. Among the documents liberated from Grenada were minutes from a politburo meeting attended by Lee and the Marxist junta. The minutes state that "Barbara Lee is here presently and has brought with her a report on the international airport done by Ron Dellums. They have requested that we look at the document and suggest any changes we deem necessary. They will be willing to make the changes."
The airport in question was being built by the Cuban military and, according to U.S. intelligence sources, was designed to accommodate Soviet warplanes. The Reagan administration regarded the airport project as part of a larger Soviet plan to establish a military base in this hemisphere, and administration officials invoked its construction as a national security justification for the invasion that followed.
Copyright © 1999 Salon Internet Inc. All rights reserved
For the full text which is even more interesting go here
------------------------------------------------------------------
Many Democrats aren't alledgedly well intentioned liberals at all. It really is a communist global conspiracy and it didn't die with the Soviet Union.
Posted by: KC Burke (UHaulNeeded@White.House)
1 06/11/1999 08:22:24 PDT
------------------------------------------------------------------
To: KC Burke
I neglected to include David's lead-in subtitle which follows:
It's hardly a surprise that China was able to steal our nuclear secrets, given the kind of people the Democrats have put in charge.
Posted with disclaimers and reverences listed above.
From: KC Burke (UHaulNeeded@White.House)
2 06/11/1999 08:27:31 PDT
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To: KC Burke
Amen. And these aren't the only ones. They are even more active in the Clinton Administration. Some how these idiots consider it chic, daring and intellectually pure to be Marxist. They still believe and preach that Communism, of course they don't use that discredited word anymore, preferring Marxists, has not worked is that it has don't been done right with the right people, them of course.
From: Mind-numbed Robot (lc123@swbell.net)
3 06/11/1999 08:37:03 PDT
------------------------------------------------------------------
To: KC Burke
Good post! Horowitz knows these clowns like a book.
From: Ben Hecks
4 06/11/1999 08:38:02 PDT
-------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Mind-numbed Robot
The incredible tragedy is that most voters who think of themselves a democrats, have no concept of the ideological scum that controls their adgenda. They are captured by their group idendification as union members, suppressed minorities or similar grouping tactics of the marxists.
From: KC Burke (UHaulNeeded@White.House)
5 06/11/1999 08:45:08 PDT
------------------------------------------------------------------
To: KC Burke
The dumocrat party has been home to every imaginable variety or species of sub-human life form for the better part of this century...homos, pedophiles, depraved perverts, thieves, perjurers and traitors. What did I leave out?? Not surprising then that the head of their party would basically incorporate ALL these traits and surround himself with similar life forms. The country is in deep, deep trouble especially now that these species have found that it's advantageous to infiltrate the republican party, seek positions of leadership and persue their destructive, traitorous work from that side of the aisle as well. You don't have to look very hard to identify who these might be.
From: kimosabe31
6 06/11/1999 08:45:34 PDT
------------------------------------------------------------------
To: kimosabe31
See my post (5) above. We must realize that it is even more insidious than just "bad" people. We all have faults, weaknesses, special interests and. yes, even serious defects of character. Originally in this nation you could rise above such hindrances, and be a thinking citizen. The left has instead stolen the citizens identity and made them part of a group. They have been taught that this group interest they must put above their own for political impact and protection from other groups.
These people are our own, mislead, brothers and sisters, "be they ever so vile," partaking in the battle can "gentle their condition." With apology to W. Shakespeare.
From: KC Burke (UHaulNeeded@White.House)
7 06/11/1999 08:53:23 PDT
------------------------------------------------------------------
To: KC Burke
"These people are our own, mislead, brothers and sisters..."
I think you're being overly charitable referring to them as "misled". They are a vile, hateful, demonic breed that has wrested control of government from the hands of trusting citizens for use as a vehicle to harm and devour as many as they can before they're cast into hell. What better example than the brutal aggression in Yugoslavia.
From: kimosabe31
8 06/11/1999 09:03:51 PDT
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To: KC Burke
V.I. Lenin, I believe, said it best: "...Success depends up subterfuge. Seize the csartists by infiltration...first gain the people, then the government!"
From: meandog
9 06/11/1999 09:06:36 PDT
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To: KC Burke
As David said, no surpise here. What was really a shocker was to learn Peggy Noonan had signed up to write for Hitlery's speechifying in NY.
From: TexMex (bperkins@mpsnet.com.mx)
10 06/11/1999 09:06:56 PDT
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To: TexMex
I read that article with disturbed feelings, as well. Upon rereading it turns out to be satirical; she isn't writing for Hillary.
From: KC Burke (UHaulNeeded@White.House)
11 06/11/1999 09:10:21 PDT
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To: kimosabe31
Perhaps we must agree to disagree, but I will try for common ground one last time.
Carlottia Scott, her nurturers and the people that appointed her, are the vile people of whom you speak, I agree. There is nothing in their character or motives redeeming them from that agenda you attribute to them.
I believe that not all democrats are of that stripe, however. There are others such as David Schippers, the Judiciary Committee counsel, Chris Mathews, the columnist in S.F., and people I count as my brothers and sisters. These people, their future children, and countless others are redeemable, and so, therefore, is our nation, IMHO. Hence my participation in this site.
If our constitutional government is not salvagable, then participation here is false, the refuge of an unmotivated revolutionary, wishing to complain and whine only. I share your outrage; I hope you share my faith in our nation's redemption.
From: KC Burke (UHaulNeeded@White.House)
12 06/11/1999 10:25:30 PDT
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To: KC Burke
Many of the seemingly confusing actions and statments by Clinton and his administration only make sense when you view him and them as dedicated Marxists. Seeing him as simply selfish (he is), a pathological liar (he is), power hungry (he is), irresponsible (he is), egotistical (yep), and all the other things we know about him is to fall for the "selective leaks" tactic. That is put enough truthful bad news out so that outrage over that hides the really, really bad news. All of his detectable faults could easily be camaflage for his covert, intense Marxism. That certainly explains much of what he does better than anything else. Hillary is probaly the more rabid of the two.
Perhaps Hillary's run for the Senate, if it is real and I doubt it, is to have her in a position to know our secrets after Slick no longer can.
From: Mind-numbed Robot (lc123@swbell.net)
13 06/11/1999 10:45:44 PDT
----------------------------------------------------------------
To: Mind-numbed Robot
I agree...I often refer to Hillary as Bill's Soviet "Control".
From: KC Burke (UHaulNeeded@White.House)
14 06/11/1999 10:47:37 PDT
|
