SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 34.50+2.6%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (83312)6/13/1999 2:08:00 PM
From: dumbmoney  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Uh, KZNerd, I'm not certain about this, but I really don't think latency will be affected by slowing DRDRAM down to 600 MHz. The transmission speed is independent of latency. Of course, this is all assuming that Rambus isn't just slowing the clock down when it downbins DRDRAM modules to 600 MHz, that Rambus is also adjusting the number of latency clocks to compensate.

Even if the core access time is the same, NET latency will definitely increase. Not 33% of course, but 5-10%.

If Camino ends up being slower than the BX/PC100, there will be hell to pay.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News