Russia's Kosovo Move Result Of US Bungling
WASHINGTON, Jun 13, 1999 -- (Agence France Presse) By mistake or by design, the United States and NATO made a string of moves on Kosovo that Moscow perceived as threatening, resulting in Russia's dramatic preemptive deployment in Kosovo and confrontation with NATO troops, experts here said.
"Washington, out of its ignorance, is treating the Russians like dirt," said George Kenney, a former State Department desk officer on the Balkans who resigned his post in 1992 in protest over US policy in the region.
"The Russians are showing that you really can't do that," he said, referring to the run by about 200 Russian troops into Kosovo where they seized the airport in the capital Pristina on Saturday before NATO peacekeeping contingents began arriving in the province.
"NATO and Washington have not even begun to grasp that it's not about Slavic brotherhood," Kenney explained. "It's about Russian concerns that NATO is a police force unto itself going around wherever it wants, possibly into Russia's neighborhood."
The seeds of renewed mistrust between the Cold War rivals were sown well before the current Kosovo crisis. NATO, for instance, has already reneged on its pledge -- offered when Moscow conceded to German reunification in 1989 -- not to expand.
But Washington's insistence on launching the NATO air war in Serbia without securing prior UN approval, its rebuff of pleas for a temporary halt to bombing during peace talks and refusal to allow a Russian peacekeeping role except under NATO command have radically compounded Moscow's anxiety.
And this, policy experts concur, runs directly counter to larger US and western security interests.
"The Russians now feel that they are in implicit confrontation with NATO," said John Steinbruner, director of foreign policy studies at the Brookings Institution, a prestigious Washington policy think tank.
"Both Russia and the United States are running standard Cold War deterrent operations against each other" with the knowledge that despite Russia's current weaknesses it remains a major nuclear power, he said.
"NATO has a major problem with Russia," Steinbruner explained. "The Russians are telling themselves that they are under severe pressure and they have to evoke their nuclear capability to fend it off."
Washington rejects suggestions that US policy makers have in any way mishandled Russia during the Kosovo crisis and insists that all short- and long-term implications for ties with Moscow were considered beforehand.
"Ultimately, the course we took was what we firmly believed was in the best interest of the United States, including taking into account our relationship with Russia," explained Mike Hammer, a National Security Council spokesman.
Many experts, however, differ.
Part of the tension that has arisen from Washington's dealing with Moscow, can be attributed to simple ignorance among top US policy makers of Russia's minimal needs, they say, for recognition as a major power.
Launching a NATO offensive in Europe, for example, without at least a token gesture towards securing some form of international assent from outside the alliance, was short-sighted, experts assert.
But more importantly, the United States and NATO have telegraphed, through rhetoric and deeds, a message to the Kremlin that Russia's interests would be minimalized or disregarded entirely if at odds with alliance plans in the Balkans.
Defense Secretary William Cohen underscored that message again Saturday, describing Russia's military presence in Kosovo as "insignificant" and suggesting that the United States would, in essence, ignore it.
"They want to treat them as the poor relations and have them on their terms," said Bill Hartung, senior researcher at the New York-based World Policy Institute, a school for international social and political research.
Russian President Boris Yeltsin "met the alliance more than half way, even though the United States never accepted or took seriously the demands of the Russians for a pause in the bombing.
"There's a much deeper suspicion in Russia of US motives than there was prior to the war and I think its harder for the pro-western elite's in Russia to explain it away now," Hartung said. ((c) 1999 Agence France Presse) |