SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (53065)6/15/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (2) of 67261
 
The post was certainly relevant. The mere fact you whined to the gods makes it relevant. I suggest you cease this needlessly self-insulting behaviour.

>If you read the SI response to me regarding JLA (which is posted), you will see that their primary concern is his threatening regarding the SI TOU.<

Sure, Michelle. I sincerely pity you. Honestly. The fact is, were you really a woman of significance, a little alleged "threat" would not have meant a thing to you. And JLA's little comment on a stock thread would not have meant anything either. It would not have gotten under your skin one whit.

[Hey everyone. Call me names in third party posts (dear me - like I really give a crap). Slam me behind my back (my lands - like you write me checks and junk). You'd be simply wasting your friggin time because I really could not give less than an ugly dog about it. Were I to see it, and were I to find myself in the mood, I would perhaps hurl a barb or two in your direction for fun-- or to make a point. But by no means would I feel compelled to whine to mama. It simply is no great issue.]

Approaching the gods about Daniel was really quite a different matter, and virtually everyone here knows it. Surely Daniel was insignificant to the uttermost, but he littered the place with a bunch of electronic pus. He did this by his own admission simply to try and make reading the thread difficult. Indeed almost every post from the guy was pure garbage. We see evidence of his remarkably twisted nature by the fact that he had not the sense to simply take his punishment like a man. It is good to have him gone simply because it allows easier browsing of the thread.

JLA, on the other hand, tweaked you here and there, but gave comment on other matters that many folks here found worthwhile. He tweaked you, and you responded in kind. He did not constantly litter the thread with utter meaninglessness. Nevertheless, you have whined and the gods have nixed him for a bit. Fine, its really no great issue-- except that it has revealed the kind of person you are.

If JLA were insignificant to you, you would not have approached the gods at all. Your alleged significance would have spoken for itself. You would not have needed the gods at all.

But JLA in fact is significant both to you and to that other thing. Perhaps its a hurt little girl thang, and as a result I just don't understand. [What is it in this world that is so awful it has power to turn a sweet little girl into a dang stinkin' womyn? Whatever it is, I do not want to see it because I am liable to shoot the blame thing (grin).]

>So your commentary regarding stock market issues is irrelevant.<

My commentary is dang relevant. The mere fact you whined makes it so. I suggest you try and have more fun.

(ding) dinnertime!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext