SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (62479)6/16/1999 6:38:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
>>>>>What about the possibility that the flamer was well intentioned but simply wrong in his/her analysis. The statement would still be false and could still cause damage. I have misinterpreted numbers, accounting rules, etc... from time to time only to be corrected by someone else later. It would seem that you should have to prove that the person knowingly flamed the company with false info in order to cause damage. You shouldn't be able to sue for incompetence.<<<<<

Hi Wayne, I think I have the answer to your question. As I told you yesterday, truth is one defense in a defamation suit. Another defense is "fair comment," that the statement, even if inaccurate, was fairly made based on actual facts, that is, there was no malicious intent.

We have to accept that we are not just sitting around in our living rooms BSing. The things we post are public, and accessable to millions of readers, we are publishers in a way that few of us ever dreamed of being. Yet, at the same time, we are just individuals, speaking our minds. The balance between the rights and obligations of you and I as individuals, and you and I as publishers, has yet to be fully resolved by the legal system. But one thing is clear: the law of defamation does apply in cyberspace, we cannot claim to be self-regulating.

I have collected some links which may be helpful:

Excellent article on law of defamation on the Internet, written at a layman's level (good comments at the end of the article):

english.upenn.edu

Fairly straightforward article, written by a lawyer, sorta out of date, but good for intro material.

cl.ais.net

Online newsmagazine forum on defamation on the Internet:

english.upenn.edu

An on-line article written by a lawyer, at about student law-review level:

vilaw.com

A large collection of links, don't know if any of them work:

cyberlibel.com

Interesting article on cyberspace as a virtual reality which should or shouldn't be self-regulated:

sw.com

Article about law as applied to USENET. Author mentions how common flaming is on USENET boards:

webjcli.ncl.ac.uk

Defamation on the internet:

informationlaw.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext