Sid, you have done some remarkable analysis on the MKTY thread as evidenced by the link below, Message 10147472
With as much time as you put into that post, and it is obviously considerable, and with the hundreds of hours you have already invested in DCHT, can you please explain to me, and to the other citizens of this thread why you won't pick up the phone and call MTEY and ask about Antaeus?
If you are truly representing the public interest as you have stated repeatedly, why wouldn't you go directly to the companies involved, instead of relying on third party information?
PS. I also notice you did a little spamming of your own on ERC the last day or so; pot calling the kettle black?
I am also surprised that you are so impressed with moltencarbonates Sid, which throw off more heat than is acceptable in many if not all applications.
Eventually PEM's will be the most widely accepted as a result of their adaptability and stackability, and as a person with as much education in the field, you have to know this. Why then won't you do some real due diligence on DCH, or do you feel you couldn't turn bullish without losing face?
Not a confrontation Sid, just simple straight forward questions that I believe deserve answers.
I think if it is really the public's best interests you have at heart, then you would be calling MTEY to get the skinny directly.
I also don't think the SEC is interested in going after a company receiving endorsements from sitting Congressmen either Sid so it's about time you get off that rant. house.gov
Not meaning to get off on a rant myself there Sid, but it is still a little too early to hit the beach in Tel Aviv, and your inconsistency on the Antaues affair finally hit the core.
You now have the phone number for the owner of MTEY and Antaeus, which is of course the same people, so please get back to us with the response.
In the meantime I will be working on my Meditteranean tan. |
