Robert Rose, I must offend you somehow or somewhere because
you have a very protective tune toward my questions regarding
where Steeny stands. Ok, let me enlighten you a bit more...
No, I don't believe your opinion or others' will influence
my decision on AOL unless I choose to be influenced, unless
there are facts that I don't know about.
We are all human, we all play cool from time to time. But
times like 'AOL is up', I definitely felt good, times like
'AOL is down or bad news for AOL', I felt depressed, after all
my hard-earnd $ is at the play, based on that fact, I like to
read cheerful notes from other chat-mates when AOL is up, I
hate to read bad-mouth notes when AOL is down even though
there are facts in the notes.
But something strange about Steeny's notes, he seems never
satisfy about AOL's performance, he expresses concerns when AOL
is up, he expresses concerns when AOL is down if not this reason then
it must be the high p/e, if he doesn't own AOL shares (long or short) then why he spent so much time tracing the whereabouts
of AOL daily?
I am just a bit curious about him, that's all I am saying.
If Steeny is genuine, he won't retreat after reading my notes otherwise we shall see.
Like I said, I don't dislike AOL-shorts as long as they come in clean
and visible.
Why do I like Robert Duke? because he is on my side so he is allowed
to repeat his jargans anytime he likes (in my dictionary).
There are a lot of people in this rooms with great knowledge including
you, I read your notes too.
Did I try to stop Steeny? I don't think so, Can anyone be stopped
in this chat room? I don't think so as long as I don't spam, just
chat and chat ...
By the ways, AOL's charts look good, it will reach the 80-100%
areas in 2 days or so, what do you think if AOL reaches
the overbought areas? Take some profit and buy back when it reaches
somewhere?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm |
