Steeny, your post. Overall a fair position. Something though needs to be clarified IMHO.
First, you say that you have been long and short. Fair.
Then you go on to say
I do not pump up AOL fundamentally when I am long.
The question that tang ( and perhaps I and other readers of these posts has ) is why ?
Why post citical points and not positive points? After all isn't beeing " fair " what it's all about? The good and the bad. Both sides. Then let the investor decide,
TA
Thread: I trade technically and short-term(week to week). Although I have a lot to
say about fundamentals and I think the internet stocks are overvalued, I generally
ignore fundamentals and trade on the charts. If you want to know my position, just
follow what I say technically. I am currently flat. AOL is at a critical level right now
sitting on it's negative trend line. It could go either way from here. Solid break
above on heavy volume will be bullish. Below, selling intact.
Tang, there are no buy signals, as u say(except stochoastics). Every other signal is
bearish. I have had very heavy positions both ways on AOL in the past few months,
but I have always felt the PEs are ridiculous. Nonetheless, I have been long AOL
on the charts until it all really broke down on 5/21.
As I've told others, if u can't take negative posts, don't read mine because I will not
hold back just because some longs get pissed off. I do not pump up AOL
fundamentally when I am long. I hold pretty steady whether long or short. I
appreciate posts from people who are knowledgable so I can learn something. I
don't care what their position is. If I say something inaccurate, let me know.
When you post you express an opinion.I have a simple questio |
