Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM)

MDMN 0.000001000

-99.0%

Jun 3 1:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: chip who wrote (15581)	6/17/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (2) of 25548

The way to prove the assets has to be through qualified experts. In a court case it's quite normal for each side to produce an expert witness to support their claim. Just because these experts are saying contradictory things doesn't mean they are biased by the fact they're being paid, it means there is enough room for both points of view. Put it this way: if you were negotiating with MDHM, would you use the House report as a negotiating point, or would you hire the most pessimistic SOB you could find and send him down there for a look-see? Just because he comes back with different numbers and interpretations, does it mean one or the other is lying or biased? No. Or one last way: Mr. House wouldn't have been hired by MDHM if MDHM wasn't reasonably certain he would be excited by what he found down there.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next