Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Charles R who wrote (62181)	6/18/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: kapkan4u	Read Replies (3) of 1571685

<Chuck - re: Also, Intel's cost structure would take a serious shock - just pick a number of Coppermines that would have shipped in Q4 and compute the dollars that Intel would be not gaining by shipping PIII catridges. All this does not even consider the speed grade issue.> How about the costs of converting four FABS to 0.18u and have them wait for the process to be re-qualified? And in addition the conversion to 0.18u is taking capacity away from 0.25u which apparently they will need back now to continue to build PeeIIIs for three or more month. So now they have to convert some capacity back to 0.25u. This makes FDIV look like a walk in the park IMHO. Kap.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next