SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Labor Ready (LRW)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dr. Seuss who wrote (193)6/18/1999 1:14:00 AM
From: Khris Vogel  Read Replies (1) of 379
 
Has anyone noticed that Vogel just hasn't been trying lately?

Has anybody noticed the IQ in this room is minimal, at best, and Vogel tries not to waste too much time w/ those who are “challenged”?

More facts....

I guess your definition of ‘facts' differs from Websters. Interesting.

OK, I'll play anyway. Should be good for a laugh.

Company treats it's managers like crap.

That's pretty funny, as the co. has NO problem filling any branch mgmt. openings.

The co. is pretty demanding when it comes to performance. But those who can produce do very, very well. And most do produce.

The rumors (not fact) of there being a spike in mgr. turnover are just that. Nice try, though.

Company out of cash.

Really? That's funny. When I look at their 1Q balance sheet, I see that they had over $24 million in cash on hand, and a $60 million LoC 100% available and ready for use. (And that was AFTER 166 stores had been opened in 1Q).

So, the co. only having 34 stores to open in 2Q98 at a cash outlay of $33k per store, works out to be only $1,122,000. Gee, unless my math is worse than even yours (i.e., basic), Seuss, that means that there is almost $83 million to cover and cash flow reqs in 2Q99. Considering that 2Q98 ops required only $8.1m in cash (which was due to the seasonality of the co.'s A/R build-up - $20.2m last year), I think that the $83 million will more than cover it.

This by far was dumbest stmt. you've made to date, and just cracks me up to no end.

Facts, indeed.

>>Company earnings out end of July.<<

Give the boy a gold star - he finally got one right.

>>Numbers won't be at all acceptable.<<

Suuuuuuuuuuure they won't. What a laugh.

>>Company was, is and will be in court for sexual and religious descrim.<<

Again...really? When has the co. EVER been subject to a discrimination suit?

The one and only time I've seen anything on that was from one of your fellow nitwit shorts, who fictiously set up a web site (at Xoom.com no less - it just doesn't get any better), claiming that his “friends” had been harrassed. When pressed for details (which offices, names, dates, etc.), the guy crawled back under the rock he came from.

If that is your “evidence”, you are even further gone than I had suspected in my wildest imagination.

>>Industry is as good as it gets and LRW is not doing that good.<<

Riiiiiiiiiiight.......whatever you say.

......

So these were your “facts”, huh? Man, I can't believe even your fellow sheep don't tell you to go find yourself another flock w/ this crud. Very poor work, Seuss.

Please post more “facts” here tomorrow. I need a good a laugh to blow off steam at the end of a not-too-fun week.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext