SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mark garner who wrote (677)6/18/1999 5:58:00 AM
From: Noneyet   of 2891
 
mr. garner,

>>>>>>you really failed to answer my post<<<<<<

And I'm not going to either. As I said last night, rick has stiffened my resolve to stay here. Thanks Rick.

>>>>>>>what i would like to see is some civility
here. i am willing to attempt it and i am sure
all others here are.<<<<<<<

First of all, I have always been civil, isn't that a fact ?????

Were you here in the beginning of the ftel thread ????

Were you one of the original "DIRTY DOZEN" whom were able to get numerous posters thrown off the thread ???? Until Silicon Investor realized what was going on. Since that time and as you are well aware the tide has turned. Let's reference this below as a point in fact.

exchange2000.com
A quote from Silicon Investor taken from the above post. Read it carefully.

>>>>>>>Your quantity of email and harassment of SI has almost insured that we will no longer consider your requests to look at this thread.

I have reviewed the last five hundred posts, and ValueSpec is not violating our Terms of Use. Mob lynching of a single poster because of "negative" comments is not the intended spirit of SI. Anyone is free to start another thread titled "FTEL - POSITIVE COMMENTS AND HYPE ONLY".<<<<<<<<<<

I did not write the above; as a matter of fact Silicon Investor had much more to lose than gain by that post, as Valuespec was up against many people in his convictions. Needless to say, Valuespec remains on S.I. and has been "PROVEN CORRECT" up to this point. The chart below will verify my statement about Valuespec being correct.

bigcharts.com.

Now look at this taken from a post of mine from yesterday and in answer to your request for civility;

exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com

Again, I have always been civil.

Next post, more answers to your inquiries.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext