Yes, you could well view some of Ron's statements as two-faced, a better view might well be seen via a quote from an old song "Swear there ain't no heaven and I'll pray there ain't no hell".
Remember, Ron did say, if he really thought there would be a major rally, he would also buy.
Ron, is it perhaps you have no real view on the subject, no interest other than in the game, the debate, the argument? That you are really the one with no concern for the common man you claim at times, as indicated by the desire to squash the new country of South Africa? No interest in the broad economic health of the markets, as indicated by your desire to let the manipulation continue with-out end?
Is your desire only to argue?
Or, are you one of the great many believers that the next wealth always moves from weak to strong hands, and when you have at last debated the gold and gold stock from what you view to be the "weak hands", you will then be willing to buy?
To date, you have argued for and against the sale of all gold by all governments of the world, for and against the concept that the price of gold is manipulated. You at one moment want the world's governments to shake free of all gold, then when I agree that a free gold market is in the best interest of all concerned, and only "the final correction" will really correct things, you are more than willing to argue the inverse, and attack my motives.
What is your TRUE reason for being here? You can't have it both ways. |
