Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2314)	6/19/1999 2:10:00 PM
From: Amit Ghate	Read Replies (3) of 4504

Hi all, Nice to finally have something to talk about! I have a couple questions (corrections?) re the NR. 1. Drill hole TG-1 intercept over interval 26.0 to 30.9 meters should read true width 4.9 m at 150.7 g/t Ag, not 12.0 m true width. This correction may slightly affect the average grade calculated for the deposit. 2. I don't understand how the average of TG-11 can be 628.9 g/t over 13.8 m, when 10.7 m of that interval show an average around 25 g/t. Are there nuggets in the samples? If so how will that affect continuity calculations? 3. How did these assays compare to the BRGM assays with respect to Ag values (which I believe are the only overlapping elements in the assays)? Best Regards, Amit

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next