Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM)

MDMN 0.000001000

-99.0%

Jun 3 1:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: coug who wrote (15783)	6/20/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: Coz	Read Replies (1) of 25548

Hi coug, One of the things I appreciate about MDHM is that they post all of their information at their web site. medinahmining.com That way anyone can go their and read these reports first hand as you have done yourself. This is a tremendous aid in forming an opinion about the company and its properties, and a great credit to Medinah as a company for making this information available to any and all interested parties. WHY they did not discuss this particular post I'm really not sure which post you are talking about. If you are talking about the Liller report. It has been discussed here. In the short time that Liller spent at the site, he seemed to corroborate Gordon House's findings. House and Liller both have clearly stated that the target is an interesting one and that more drilling will be needed to prove the extent of the find. Generally, this has been viewed in a positive light on this thread, but the beauty of MDHM making this report publicly available at their site is that this allowed you to go there and form a personal opinion on your own. The people on this thread have always encourage new investors to do their own research and form their own opinions, and I'm glad that you have done this and shared your views here. I think it is important for everyone to see that different conclusions can be reached from reviewing the same data. If your statement above regards why "the cannon's" post was not discussed on this thread. I recall there was some talk about it, but really, what's to discuss? He did his DD and posted his opinion. Isn't that what we all do?... what you did today? I don't think it's necessary to discuss everyone's opinions in detail, but I do know that when facts and reports come to light, they are discussed here, and the sources are noted and links given so all can go to the source material. Again, it is important and encouraged that everyone does their own research and draws their own conclusions. --Coz

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next