SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Porter who wrote (62503)6/20/1999 1:57:00 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1572981
 
Steve

In an article in Monday's IBD the following was said re its availability:

"Though AMD has been fairly quiet about such a crucial product, a spokesman says PC's powered by the k7 will start showing up in retail stores as soon as next month. The company plans to kick off a marketing campaign then, when it's expected to reveal which PC makers have ordered the chip." ( OT: BTW the next Dell is NOT Dell)

The article goes on to say: " A few months ago, AMD quietly named Lance Smith, director of marketing for enterprise systems including workstations" According to AMD's S. Allen " We do want to establish beachheads there". But "its not going to occur tomorrow."

The article compared yoy shares of retail microprocessor sales by intc and AMD for the month of April:

April, 1998: intc: 71.9%, AMD: 25.4% (bal. attributable to Cyrix)

April, 1999: Intc: 53.2%, AMD: 40.5% (bal. attributable to Cyrix)

These figures would seem to refute some of the recent comments on this thread stating that AMD is sitting on an inventory of chips (Unless of course overall chip sales are down yoy which i doubt.)

There is a conflict in the article which someone may be able to clear up for me. At one point it states that the k-7 will come in at 600 MHz vs the pentium III's 550. Then later they quote Kumar of piper jaffrey who states "AMD can do no better than stay even (on MHZ) against the pentium III". It appears that these statements are at odds with each other and one of them must be wrong. Any comments?

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News