SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 95.57+0.7%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Green who wrote (23040)6/21/1999 12:24:00 AM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
<< Actually the "pump and dump" was in ref. to comments made by someone else. >>

I know that Don. I think it was melodramatic.

<<As for analysts my wife was a well respected research analyst for Goldman, and J.P. Morgan for many years, and I have many friends who are still CFA's and also fund managers. I know very clearly how they are compensated and operate.>>

So if you know this, why did you say that all that is at stake for an analyst is a bonus? There are more than just bonuses at stake, and this is why analysts never rate a stock a "sell." It is a big game, and analysts are not clean. You say you know how analysts are compensated, but you kept that to yourself, and instead referred to some bonus. Analysts can make $2 million or more per year if they bring in enough underwriting revenue from the companies they follow; however they can also lose their jobs if they don't make their underwriting revenue quotas. I think you need to be a bit more forthright regarding the analyst game and the phony facade it entails.

Remember the major broker house analyst who issued a sell on AMZn, saying it was a $30 stock, or somesuch? I agreed with that. He was relieved of his duties. I wonder why?

David Dreman did a study a while back for a ten year stretch of time. His findings indicated that analysts' estimates of corp earnings are substantially wrong, to the optimistic side, more than 65% of the time. I think it is deliberate on the part of analysts.

Then there is the whole earnings estimate/beating estimates game, a whole other realm of gaming the system by analysts and companies.

<< As for Rambus getting hit, I think I said earlier it will likely get hit hard, but rebound quickly and I prefer to step aside with profits and buy lower and wait for rebound. I am very pro Rambus, I just don't like the VERY high P/E, and lack of coverage by many big players.

As for "outperforming the market" doesn't mean too much if the market is down 2000 or 3000 points from here a year from now. >>

Do you mean the Dow? Please tell me the level at which the market will begin to make the XXX-point plunge, what the point drop will be, and when it will start to reverse. If you cannot tell me this then, IMO, your above-stated strategy is completely without merit.

I still don't understand your apprehension re the analyst coverage thing. You could buy microsoft- they're covered by lots of analysts, aren't they?

thanks
Victor
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext