Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO 78.18

+0.2%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sabrejet who wrote (26472)	6/21/1999 9:23:00 AM
From: JGoren	Read Replies (1) of 77400

OT: In press conference, NHL exec said they did review the play. He said that the tower reviews all goals before they are okayed. Exec further explained that refs are shown tapes of plays that meet the exception to the crease rule and that that goal came within the exception. He further stated that there is no loss of possession when a shot is made and the puck bounces off the goalie or the goal; therefore Hull was never considered to have lost possession; he was continuing to play the puck. It is not solely a question of whether Hull's foot was within the crease at the time he slammed home the last shot. There were plenty of potential penalties that might have resulted in power plays; the refs weren't calling them on the Sabres, either. From the second overtime forward, the hitting dropped off to practically nothing, just skating as both teams tired. The momentum did seem to slowly shift to the Stars in the third overtime. Fact is when a game goes that long and the teams tire, chances are that the winning goal becomes controversial.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next