SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Philosopher who wrote (41293)6/21/1999 12:12:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
>A scientist observes phenomena,

But often chooses to ignore phenomena which don't fit their perceptions.<

I must object. Scientists come in all flavors, but the trend is toward honesty. They may be a little slow to come around to a controversial theory that cannot be dismissed - but if the theory holds water they will come around in a generation or two. The singularly fascinating component of the scientific method is that nothing is fixed in stone. Even the vaunted theory of evolution would be subject to revision if truly inconvenient and verifiable facts came to light. The consensus on evolution is So far, So good. Thus I "believe in" evolution as long as it remains consistent with the source material - primary observables like hands-on fossils ot animal populations or DNA.
Any scientist who selectively ignores inconvenient facts in order to hang onto a pet theory will see that theory dismissed within one generation of his demise. Do you have refuting examples? If so - I'd be fascinated and I'd be willing to amend or modify my opinion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext