SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : CXI-Commodore Environmental

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: hcm1943 who wrote (1609)6/21/1999 7:07:00 PM
From: NicktheGreek  Read Replies (1) of 1755
 
Off the YaHoo board

This may be the press release........
COALITION CALLS FOR RESIGNATION OF SENIOR ARMY OFFICIAL FOR LYING TO CONGRESS, PUBLIC ABOUT FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CHEM. WEAPONS DISPOSAL OPTIONS
Internal Defense Department Documents Show Funds' Were "Hidden" From Promising Alternative Disposal Program

Department of Defense (DOD) auditor's memo made public today I by a coalition of citizen groups shows that Deputy Secretary of the Army for Chemical Demilitarization, Dr. Theodore Prociv, falsely told members of Congress, the media and community groups that no more federal money was available to demonstrate non-incineration technologies to destroy the nation's chemical weapons arsenal. The DOD memo, titled "Pot of Gold" by its agency author, concludes that Prociv's program actually had about $400 million in unspent funds on hand. In a letter to Army Secretary Louis Caldera, the Chemical Weapons Working Group (CWWG) called for Prociv's resignation, noting "Dr. Prociv misrepresented the fiscal situation within the Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program in order to derail the progress of non-incineration technologies."
From May to December of last year Prociv continually stated that his budget was not sufficient to demonstrate viable alternatives to incineration even though Congress had directed the Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment (ACWA) program to assess these non-incineration disposal methods. In May 1998, ACWA announced that six technologies passed its stringent criteria, making them eligible for a demonstration phase. However, Dr. Prociv claimed
repeatedly that the $25 million needed to demonstrate all six technologies could not be found in his agency. Thus, only three technologies moved forward.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext