SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (41541)6/22/1999 12:48:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) of 108807
 
How is educating vs. not educating the same human raw material elitist?

That's not exactly what I said.

The argument was that educating more people gave a better chance of a civilized society.

The underlying belief, then, is that educated people are more likely to be civilized than uneducated people.

That's what I considered elitist. After all, I've known some highly educated bastards and some illiterate people who were VERY civilized.

(It depends, too, on what you include in education. This whole thread started with a discussion of universal public education, so that's the background. So it would exclude going to plays and museums, attending festivals, celebrations, churches, parental and grandparental education, etc.)

Whether elitism is considered good or bad, my argument was not (as you took it) that educating people is elitist,. It was that saying that educated people are more likely to be civilized than uneducated people is elitist.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext