SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR)
CCUR 2,5000.0%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jeffbas who wrote (9805)6/23/1999 7:18:00 AM
From: Nimbus  Read Replies (2) of 21142
 
VOD Systems: Still the Wave of the Future

By CRAIG KUHL June 21, 1999

Chicago -- Video-on-demand's longtime promise to deliver movies and events anytime, anywhere remains to a large degree unfulfilled, and for many cable operators, it is proving to be a painstakingly slow road to profitability.

Despite the drastic cost reductions for set-top boxes (now less than $350), file servers, costs per stream (about $350) and other VOD-related hardware, the motion-picture studios' portion of movie fees to on-demand-service providers is holding at about 50 percent.

And with only pockets of VOD service available, cable operators and VOD providers are trying to remain patient.

Nagging obstacles such as gaining economies of scale, dealing with hefty studio fees and managing a new and relatively untested VOD business are slowing its progress.

Yet panelists at one of last week's National Show sessions here, along with other VOD proponents, expect true VOD to flourish in the next four to five years.

"It will change people's concepts of television. It will be like the Internet, and it will encourage people to think of it as a brand-new service, available all of the time," said Dan Sheeran, senior vice president of product management for VOD-equipment provider nCUBE, during last week's panel.

Most experts agreed that VOD still has great potential. But some wondered about its viability as a legitimate revenue generator and when it will fully bloom.

"We tend to think 'out there,' and not about the backing systems that have to be managed," said Rick Colletto, vice president of programming for pay-per-view programmer TVN Entertainment Corp.

"Those kinds of issues -- multiple servers, multiple locations, satellite delivery -- will prohibit VOD growth for awhile," Colletto added. "The front end is working: The back end needs work."

Some of that work entails upgrading systems to 750-megahertz capacity and replacing all cable from the nodes back to the headend with fiber, which can be costly. The payback though, Sheeran said, is likely to be impressive.

"There are costs and complexities of deployment now, but set-top costs don't have to be borne by operators just to deliver VOD," he added, noting that nCUBE has invested $100 million in VOD technology currently deployed by six MSOs.

To push VOD economies of scale to the point of viability, simplifying the VOD-deployment process requires some vision and savvy, according to Diva Systems Corp. president David Zucker. "[VOD is] a very complicated process, but the real hard part is system management," he added.

Those issues, Zucker insisted, go beyond traditional management decisions and strategies. "There's network management, software management and the whole front end of network operations like marketing, coding and video-asset management," he said.

Once VOD crosses those borders, however, on-demand services will expand, Sheeran predicted.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext