Sorry, but you misinterpret the reason for my posts to you. Fuel cells and fuel cell technology are being developed in order to provide "cleaner" methods of energy production. I would think that if you have emphasima you would embrace this, however you talk about wasted heat, the fact is, this is a great improvement over what we have today. I honestly question your motives for your opposition to this technology, especially on an investment chat site. I have no desire to fight with you, you had some questions and comments, well, the way I see it they have been addressed? If your motives are the environment, I find it awfully "strange" you comment on the melting of rubber and plastics. Additionally I have yet to see you post much similar opposition to other fuel cell company's, hey, they are in the same boat as GLE. If you like, I will give you a link to a list of about 30 companies working on fuel cells. I would like to see you post your opposition to them all, as well as your concerns relative to the high operating temperature of an external reformer on PEM fuel cell company sites. Once I see that opposition perhaps then I will buy your "story".
One more thing, everything I basically posted to you were quotations without alot of comment from myself. So how you see that as an argument confuses me. You have issues, they have been addressed.
Perhaps if you are going to challenge the merits of this technology you should realize that people are going to answer your comments. If you think a "published" answer to your comments constitutes an argument then perhaps you should find another sandbox to play in.
Chip |
