Here we go, in the circus of the absurd this comment is legal and allowable content.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I tried to be forthright with you in that post, but now I'm not sure you are willing to or want to discuss FCM in a realistic way.......so unless you change your tune this is my last civil post to you.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Let's rephrase that comment.
I tried to get my message to youse nice bro, but youse wond listen, whads the smatter wid you, Now, you either seys what I want or we be intimadating you from now on. YOU HERE"S ME
Yeh and thad tom, he don know jack man, he pud up thad damn three year chard agian. Like anywho is gong to belive him or thad chard.
Thads ok, cause we be jest use replie # 24.
"you wad anothr two ears an you see, yeh, talk at us in two ears, you waded who many ears ready, nother two ears meens squat, youse tak my word on id, thad bees gospell"
tahd tom man, he pud up that nosence aboud petrocelli suits, we goes to replie # 17;
"Jes cause thad suit filled by franklin seys thad usat not bees a consumer no more..s, dont nod meen thad usat nod bees a consumer no more...s, you gots id"
yeh, and thad tom he be seys aboud som sudsichurarys, wel we goes too replie # 15;
"sudsichurarys meens whad we wans id to meens, an when we wands id too meen id, id aint meening thad one companie cantrols nother, thad for sur"
webeesflyingtothemoonsoonbare |
