Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (8675)	6/24/1999 7:03:00 AM
From: bconard	Read Replies (2) of 11603

Alan, I tend to agree with you on two points. I think that the 'air drilling' even with the addition of the water is a 'risky' plan and they may well wash away the desired results. If so, their credibility will be damaged very badly on another COC with low results. On another point, the following is the last paragraph of the 6/7/99 update. <<Prospective joint venture partners minimally require evidence of a Chain-of-Custody completed report and/or corroboration in their laboratories. In certain instances a complete Ore Reserve Audit, plus a Feasibility Study is required. The current Maxam Gold Corporation Chain-of-Custody analysis pursuit is being continued to provide the Company with these options.>> I've read and re-read this and still come away with the understanding that without a good COC, the 30MM funding might not be available. I know Richard said he talked to Dale about this point and was assured that it wasn't a problem, but... Also if the funding was a sure thing, why not go with the core drilling and avoid any possible chance of loosing the fines. It's more expensive and would probably take longer, but it would be the safest. Long Lurker Bob

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next