Man, I can't believe I am trying to debate with a child-mind here.
Your last post makes no sense at all.
<<<<< Well now you tell me who does own any of the aforementioned companies ( fcm's, fnet's, fnet internet ).Lucent, Paul Allen, Bill Gates, who Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee, that defies logic !!!!!!! >>>>>
Exactly, Tommy!
You really need to study a little more on the subject of LOGIC.
Read on...
In your post #838, you question how Fnet can be the the subsidiary of FCM, when FCM is reported to be the subsidiary of Fnet.
You state that one is the "COMPLETE OPPOSITE" of the other and with this innuendo and paraphrasing, you try to confuse everyone.
This situation can only be true if one is completely owned by the other (if only partially owned, then the two cannot be completely opposite), but in your last post you say that this defies logic (whatever that means in this context???). If you recognize that one cannot "own" the other, then your statement falls apart.
You lose.
Besides, as I pointed out, it clearly states on the website that both Fnet and FCM are seperate, individual companies with common management.
Again, who cares?
That's the trouble with lies, though. The more you tell, the more difficult it becomes to remember what you have said. They will always catch up to you.
S&P |
