Rick I enjoy the way you attempt to make trivia out the fact that franklin confused who was which companies subsidiary. After and despite, the fact you were proven wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You wrote;
>>>>>>>>>Man, I can't believe I am trying to debate with a child-mind here.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
You feel the need to throw in your BS comments. I have always refrained from making any derogatory comments towards you, but, not you, my friend. You could not believe that you were debating with a child-mind ( You knew you were above that ). Who's mind is child like now, Rick ???? It safe to assume from the correction, franklin did not agree WITH YOU.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Most companies know this instinctively, and can get that information correct in print or verbally, even if they forget to dot an i, or cross a t, forget a comma.
The fact that the company was confused over who was who's subsidiary can definitely be equated with the misplacing of a comma or neglect to dot an i. Why, it would certainly be absurd for anyone to think those two mistakes are not equally important.
Bull Spin Doctor reply # 21;
If the company was confused about subsidiary's, and gave out conflicting statements, tell them, that mistake is the same as omitting a comma. HUH ????? |
