SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 88.13+1.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: REH who wrote (23708)6/25/1999 5:07:00 PM
From: Sonki  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
The Futile Exercise of Trying to Put a Rational Value on Rambus thestreet.com

Tuesday Thud:

Just for fun: Yesterday Rambus (RMBS:Nasdaq) closed in on the 12-month targets of some analysts when it
topped 100. No big deal in a market where many, if not most, Internet valuations are considered way out of
whack. Or in a market that has helped inflate Micron Technology (MU:NYSE), despite every suggestion that the
darling of DRAM's valuation at almost any point in recent years was more than out of whack. (Yep, the same
Micron that has made yours truly look like a fool more times than I care to remember.)

So where does Rambus stand in the world of the out-of-whacked? One argument, posed by a longtime
anti-Rambus rabble-rouser, goes like this: If Rambus gets 100% of the memory chip market over in the next year
or two, and gets a royalty of 2% on each chip sold -- the high end of expectations -- you'd be looking at 2%
(again, on the high end) of an estimated $10 billion market. That would be $200 million, or roughly one-tenth its
current valuation.

Even if you applied Intel's (INTC:Nasdaq) current multiple of seven-times-sales you'd still come up short, and
that's before deducting expenses (albeit low) and taxes (like any other company). "You can't justify that unless
you think the whole DRAM market will explode, like some kind of nuclear strike in Korea," our skeptic says. "How is
1% or 2% worth 2 to 3 billion dollars" in market valuation?

Simple: market sentiment and momentum. Just as they drove Micron to unrealistic and unsustainable levels, so will
they drive Rambus. "It's not like people are making rational judgements of Internet stocks, either," says SG
Cowen's outspoken Drew Peck, who is just as likely to be negative on a company as he is positive. (In this case,
he has a buy rating on the company; Cowen did not underwrite Rambus' 1997 public offering.)

In a nutshell, Peck sees it like this: The DRAM market is currently at the low point of its pricing cycle, and
annualized, the DRAM market is twice the size of the number used by our skeptic (who based his estimate on
Micron's sales). Peck also is looking for a DRAM shortage starting late next year, and he believes Rambus will be
in the right place at the right time with the right (256-meg) chip. He also says critics don't take into account the
fact that Rambus' logic chips that are bought by video game makers, which he figures add another 50% onto the
projected sales figures.

He also believes Rambus could earn as much as $7 to $8 per share in 2001 or 2002, compared with 28 cents last
year. He says his analysis assumes that Intel provides "unwavering" support for Rambus. Intel's chips, using
Rambus technology, are expected to ship in September. (See my colleague Marcy Burstiner's excellent coverage of
Rambus for more detail.) If Intel backs away, he adds, "all bets are off."

In the meantime, our Rambus rabble-rouser argues, so is rational analysis.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext