CSFB Direct(DIR) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : CSFB Direct(DIR)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: $Mogul who wrote (193)	6/25/1999 10:59:00 PM
From: Fred Fahmy	Read Replies (2) of 406

<In term of being #1, they are not in in independent studies like Gomez, which means alot more than barrons, because guess who pays Barons in ads, yes DLJ.> From your post: exchange2000.com You also have 'ALOT' in your profile Forget the mistake and let's look at the content of your sentence. Your example of Gomez is incredibly poor since Gomez rated DIR best on-line broker 5 of the last 7 quarters. Gomez loves DIR. Second the notion that Barron's chose DIR #1 simply because they advertise is silly. I suppose they were the only firm in the study that advertises in Barron's? What about Worth Magazine are they also in DIR's pocket? And Gomez...what...bribes under the table <gg>? You seem to really be upset that so many people choose DIR #1. Perhaps you are also upset that your prediction of DIR doubling is looking pretty weak right now? FF

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next