I think the word you were looking for is "trivial", not "trivia"!!!
See how a simple mistake on your part can change the entire meaning of your post!!! (that was a typo, right?)
Franklin did the same thing you did (as the entire planet is well aware - yourself included), in the questioned news releases. I am sure that they are not at all confused as to what their companies consist of (and I am sure you know this too).
<<< After and despite, the fact you were proven wrong. >>>
Aside from the terrible grammer in the above sentence, I do understand your meaning, but I fail to understand what I was proven wrong about.
<<< It safe to assume from the correction, franklin did not agree WITH YOU. >>>
Agree with me about what?
<<< Most companies know this instinctively... >>>
I was not aware that companies had instincts!
Again, see how simple grammatical errors can change the meaning of a statement.
I understand from your last paragraph that you are labelling me a Franklin "bull" poster. Can you point to my last bullish post?
I was very gentle in responding to your post here, seeking only to point out to you that it is very easy to tear apart a poorly written document (just as you insist on doing with FCM). There is no malice and no derogatory narrative in this post. There are many more errors to which I could have applied negative innuendo (one of your tactics) or rewritten for you (another of your tactics - and a particularly annoying one, I might add).
I choose not to, not wishing to offend you.
By the way, I very much doubt that I am your friend. Why do you address me as such? Surely you don't talk to your friends in the manner that you talk to me!
S&P |
