Rick,
I wrote;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Rick I enjoy the way you attempt to make trivia out the fact that franklin confused who was which companies subsidiary. After and despite, the fact you were proven wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The dictionary's meaning of trivia;
trivia n : something of small importance [syn: triviality, trifle, small
So within the sentence that it was used, it fit. However, you seem to be saying the use of that word in my sentence, somehow has the same significance as whether fcm is fnet's subsidiary, or vice versa. As that information has been corrected, it would seem that the inaccurate information did have some importance to franklin. We did find out that this mistake happened because of another company's error, and I assume a lack of proof reading by franklin. The point remains, it was corrected, by franklin.
You wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It seems that under the definition of the word, both FNet and FCM are subsidiaries of one another, depending on the point of view.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
exchange2000.com
Your definition is of "subsidiary" is, and was wrong. In the above sentence you wrote, that fnet and fcm can be subsidiary's of each other, that is incorrect.
By the way Rick, perhaps you can explain this. Is it also an error ??
biz.yahoo.com
TEK DigiTel and Franklin Telecom Sign $2M Agreement
A quote from that press release;
According to the agreement, revenues for TEK DigiTel are forecasted at about $2 million over two years.
Can you kindly explain what this for franklin. |
