Your Bear Stearns report shows how absurd your earlier comment was:
Message 10252234
In case you missed LGND's latest press release, they filed an NDA for oral Targretin.
Using your active imagination, you used a Bear Stearns report on a possible topical Targretin filing by the 4Q of last year to somehow lend support to your comment that the oral NDA was 6-9 months late.
Obviously, LGND elected to file on oral first and there was no printed document predicting a 3Q '98 filing for oral Targretin for CTCL.
A few days ago, you said that this filing was 6-9 months late! Thus if my calculations are correct, you are saying that the filing was due in 3Q, 1998! Such a filing would have been a month after my post, and I had noted that LGND had said end of 1998, beginning of 1999, which I don't think gave any hint of a Sept, 1998 filing.
Thus, your comment on the NDA filing of oral being filed as early as Sept 1998 seems to have no support, and the existence of a LGND document indicating a 3Q, '98 filing is a figment of your imagination, at best. |
