SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: nihil who wrote (41896)6/27/1999 3:39:00 AM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (3) of 108807
 
<<As to income tax, it is self-defeating, since the income of smart people chooses to be
earned somewhere else (as in tax havens) leaving only those too poor or dumb (or too
moral) to pay. Ultimately, when all is said and done, only an expenditure (or
value-added tax) can survive human mobility. Taxing capital or savings or the returns on
them and estates make them run away.>>

This is news, I am sure, to the U.S. treasury, which regularly collects quite a bit of income tax from most of us. I would agree that confiscatory tax structures like Britain's do cause the rich to leave. I make it a point to do the exact opposite of people like Imelda Marcos, so I guess I am too moral (or dumb) to totally evade taxes.

There is nothing really wrong with a value-added tax, except that it has just as many problems and inequities as income tax. It needs to be set up so that the poor can afford to buy essentials, so luxury and big ticket items are usually heavily taxed. This almost destroyed the luxury boat business a few years ago, for example. It also leads to smuggling on a large scale of things like tobacco products.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext