COM21 (CMTO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COM21 (CMTO)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DZOO who wrote (667)	6/27/1999 2:30:00 PM
From: pat mudge	Read Replies (1) of 2347

Good article. And I believe the FCC's Kennard recently indicated he'd rule in favor of cable interests. One a different subject --- CDMA patents -- I have a question on Broadcom. Last week STII was acquired by NN in a transaction that includes all their patents both issued and pending. Prior to the announcement, STII settled their lawsuit with Broadcom --- and BRCM's reciprocal lawsuit against STII --- with BRCM getting non-exclusive right to certain patents and the option to license CDMA over coaxial cable technology. newsalert.com Considering the right is non-exclusive, I would imagine anyone wanting to develop cable modem chips will license the same technology (now held by NN) and compete head-to-head with BRCM. Am I right to assume this will be positive for CMTO? In other words, the more chip competition there is, the lower the prices will likely be? If so, who are the likely developers? I tried doing a CDMA subject search to see who might already have similar patents and while I found lots of references, I couldn't tell what was what. A glance at the competition's patents related to CDMA: Robert Bosch: 164.195.100.11 Motorola (CDMA/ASICs) 164.195.100.11 adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PALL&OS=Motorola+AND+CDMA&RS=%28Motorola+AND+CDMA%29&TD=439&Srch1=%28Motorola+AND+CDMA%29&StartNum=&Refine=Refine+Search&Query=Motorola+AND+CDMA+AND+ASICs Lucent (CDMA/ASICs) 164.195.100.11 adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PALL&OS=Motorola+AND+CDMA+AND+ASICs&RS=%28%28Motorola+AND+CDMA%29+AND+ASICs%29&TD=18&Srch1=%28%28Motorola+AND+CDMA%29+AND+ASICs%29&StartNum=&Refine=Refine+Search&Query=Lucent+AND+CDMA+AND+ASICS Note the date on this one: 164.195.100.11 Alcatel and CDMA: 164.195.100.11 adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PALL&OS=Lucent+AND+CDMA+AND+cable+AND+modems&RS=%28%28%28Lucent+AND+CDMA%29+AND+cable%29+AND+modems%29&TD=2&Srch1=%28%28%28Lucent+AND+CDMA%29+AND+cable%29+AND+modems%29&StartNum=&Refine=Refine+Search&Query=Alcatel+AND+CDMA If anyone knows how to read these documents, or knows how the competitive landscape will develop, I welcome your comments. Perhaps Mark could give a general answer, without reference to any particular company. Thanks in advance. Pat

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next